EU-Strafen, an einem Ort.

Two Digital Markets Act non-compliance decisions: €460 million for self-preferencing Google’s own services in Search, and €430 million for anti-steering restrictions on Google Play.

For breaching Digital Services Act transparency obligations, including a deceptive paid 'blue checkmark' verification design, an inadequate advertising repository, and failure to provide researchers with access to public data.

Irish DPC fine for GDPR breaches in transferring EEA user personal data to China and related transparency failures about those transfers.

For breaching Digital Markets Act anti-steering rules by restricting app developers from informing iOS users about alternative offers outside the App Store.

For breaching Digital Markets Act rules requiring a less-personalised equivalent service when users refuse consent to combine personal data across Meta services (pay-or-consent model).

For abusing dominance by tying Facebook Marketplace to Facebook and imposing unfair trading conditions on rival online classified ads providers that advertise on Meta platforms.

The Polish antimonopoly office (UOKiK) fined Iveco's Polish unit 155 million PLN (approximately €34.7 million) for participating in a cartel with local distributors between 2009 and 2019.

Spanish competition authority (CNMC) fine for abusing a dominant position by imposing unfair trading conditions on Spanish hotels and restricting competition from other online travel agencies.

For abusing its dominant App Store position by imposing anti-steering provisions that prevented music streaming apps from informing iOS users about cheaper subscriptions outside the app.

For illegally transferring EU users’ personal data to the US, violating data protection rules.

Irish DPC fines totalling €390 million (€210 million for Facebook and €180 million for Instagram) for unlawfully relying on 'contract' as the legal basis for behavioural advertising under GDPR.

Irish DPC fine related to a Facebook personal data scraping incident affecting hundreds of millions of users, following an EDPB dispute-resolution process.

Irish DPC fine for GDPR breaches in processing children's personal data on Instagram, including public-by-default accounts for teens and exposure of contact details on business accounts.

French CNIL fine for making it easier to accept cookies than to refuse them on Google services (including YouTube), in breach of French ePrivacy rules.

French CNIL fine against Facebook for making cookie refusal more difficult than acceptance, in breach of French ePrivacy rules.

Irish DPC fine for failing GDPR transparency obligations toward WhatsApp users and non-users, including clarity on data sharing with other Facebook companies.

Luxembourg CNPD GDPR fine against Amazon Europe Core for processing personal data for targeted advertising without a valid legal basis / adequate transparency (appealed; decision confirmed in Amazon disclosures).

European Commission fine for restricting cross-border sales of licensed football club and federation merchandising products within the EEA.

For abusing its dominance in online search advertising intermediation (AdSense) by imposing restrictive clauses that prevented rivals from placing search ads on third-party websites.

For illegally imposing restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators to strengthen its dominance in general internet search.

For abusing its dominant market position, Qualcomm paid Apple billions between 2011 and 2016 to ensure exclusive use of Qualcomm LTE baseband chipsets in iPhones, thereby excluding competitors.

For receiving illegal tax advantages (state aid) via a special tax deal, Amazon was ordered to repay back taxes to Luxembourg after an investigation by the European Commission.

For abusing its dominance as a search engine to give an illegal advantage to its own comparison shopping service.

For receiving illegal tax benefits (state aid) from Ireland, which allowed it to pay extraordinarily low effective tax rates.

For participating in a 14-year truck manufacturing cartel that fixed prices and coordinated on passing on costs of new emissions technologies.

For participating in a 14-year truck manufacturing cartel that fixed prices and coordinated on passing on costs of new emissions technologies.

For breaching commitments to offer users a choice of web browsers, after Microsoft failed to include a promised Browser Choice screen in Windows updates.

For participation in a cartel related to price-fixing of cathode ray tubes used in televisions and computer monitors.

For abusing its dominant position in the x86 microprocessor market by granting conditional rebates to PC makers (and payments to a retailer) to exclude rival AMD.

For failing to comply with a 2004 EU antitrust order (not providing required interoperability information on reasonable terms).